-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 181
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BREAKING: repository structure change #782
Conversation
@cboettig Sorry for the delay, but now that we can generate at least some Dockerfiles and bakefiles, could you please take a look at this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think everything here so far looks very solid!
Regarding the building last 2 versions: this all makes sense. But in this new setup is it still possible to occasionally build older versions in order to benefit from the ubuntu-lts security patches released for them?
This is only possible for images that have the exact same structure as the most recent images. For example, r-ver is fine for all versions, but rstudio cannot go back beyond a certain point because it becomes impossible to build linux/arm64 platform at some point. |
@cboettig Do you think geospatial-ubuntugis is still needed? |
…e generation script [skip ci]
…e generation script [skip ci]
…generation script [skip ci]
Let's merging for now... |
A follow up for #782 I was looking at the wiki and realized that I had forgotten to set the LANG environment variable for rocker/r-ver.
I forked from this repo about a year ago https://github.com/shug0131/rocker-versioned2/ . This basically adds a layer on top of rocker with extra packages, plus adds some extra libraries to allow the basic UAT to pass. But it is anchored to the old version. How would you recommend I go about merging it back with your changes to the repo structure? Would there be a way to avoid forking and making my repo copy-edit directly from the main repo ? |
I do not understand the intent of your question. |
Part of #776