You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
in the rise of #129, we should figure out what to support / not support. the story unfolds:
there's a static client (with static keys and static IP addresses), where nothing dynamic is used from the server
there can be partially dynamic clients: i.e. do tls auth & authentication, then use NCP for cipher selection [or no NCP], but have the ip address configuration hardcoded in the configuration file [this still requires a push-request / push-reply to figure out the cipher -- unless there's no NCP used] (as far as i can tell)
the multi-client server: here the client receives its ip configuration from the server (and thus a push_request / push_reply is needed for ip configuration)
it looks like the second case is not supported by miragevpn -- in case we find such a deployed configuration, we should re-evaluate. see as well #129 (comment)#129 (comment) for previous discussions).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
in the rise of #129, we should figure out what to support / not support. the story unfolds:
it looks like the second case is not supported by miragevpn -- in case we find such a deployed configuration, we should re-evaluate. see as well #129 (comment) #129 (comment) for previous discussions).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: