You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I opened the same issue to the wrong place in the riscv-c-api-doc. So I open a new one here.
We get the GNU binutils patches from Marcus Comstedt recently, to support RISCV big endian targets [1]. In the patches, we need to add new assembler options, -mbig-endian and -mlittle-endian, to choose the endian in assembler. I have raised another issue to discuss the new target triplet in the psabi, riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc#167. Once we all agree with these changes, we will need to add the new assembler options, -mbig-endian and -mlittle-endian, into the c-api-doc, too.
Hi Guys,
I opened the same issue to the wrong place in the riscv-c-api-doc. So I open a new one here.
We get the GNU binutils patches from Marcus Comstedt recently, to support RISCV big endian targets [1]. In the patches, we need to add new assembler options, -mbig-endian and -mlittle-endian, to choose the endian in assembler. I have raised another issue to discuss the new target triplet in the psabi, riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc#167. Once we all agree with these changes, we will need to add the new assembler options, -mbig-endian and -mlittle-endian, into the c-api-doc, too.
Thanks
Nelson
[1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2020-December/114632.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: