Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

llbox domain specification vs actual data domain in object or in a file #225

Open
jypeter opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@jypeter
Copy link

jypeter commented Oct 8, 2021

This is probably explained in the cdo documentation. I don't have time to (re)read right now, but a note about what happens in the following cases would not hurt in the llbox : extract a latitude-longitude box documentation

llbox arguments:

    latmin : minimum latitude
    latmax : maximum latitude
    lonmin : minimum longitude
    lonmax : maximum longitude

Object domain: latmin_obj, latmax_obj, lonmin_obj, lonmax_obj

  • What happens when the llbox and object longitude domains don't match, but the domains could be automatically shifted by taking the 360 degrees periodicity into account? e.g. the object is defined on [0, 360[ and the user requests [-180, 180[. Do you get a full new object on [-180, 180[, or an intersection of only [0, 180[
  • What happens when the object latitudes are increasing, e.g. [-90, 90], and the user requests decreasing latitudes on purpose, e.g latmin=90, latmax=0. Do you get nothing, northern hemisphere with increasing latitudes, or northern hemisphere with decreasing latitudes?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant