Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
57 lines (41 loc) · 2.66 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

57 lines (41 loc) · 2.66 KB

PSYC 421: Environmental Sustainability Project at UBC

Overview

This project explores environmental sustainability practices at the University of British Columbia (UBC), focusing on behaviors related to single-use cups. Guided by Dr. Jiaying Zhao and the SEEDS program, we analyzed interventions to influence the use of single-use versus reusable cups.

Team Members - Sustain-A-Cup Squad

  • Riddhi Battu (Author)
  • Yuzuo Chen
  • Pedro de Faria Santos
  • Gloria Gu
  • Disha Jain
  • Malvika Krishnan

Objectives

  • To analyze the effectiveness of "Gain," "Loss," and "Control" interventions on single-use cup behavior.
  • To assess the impact on reducing single-use cups and increasing reusable cup usage.

Methodology

  • Data Collection: Survey data from 258 UBC participants using Qualtrics; 253 valid responses after excluding missing values.
  • Data Analysis:
    • Preprocessing: Cleaning and coding survey responses.
    • Statistical Analysis:
      • Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variances: No evidence of variance inequality, validating ANOVA assumptions.
      • Shapiro-Wilk Test for Normality: Residuals from ANOVAs did not follow normal distribution, necessitating the use of Kruskal-Wallis tests.
      • Kruskal-Wallis Test and Dunn’s Test for post-hoc analysis on non-parametric data.

Results

Q2: Surprisingness of Information

  • Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 18.661, df = 2, p < 0.0001: Significant differences in perceived surprisingness.
  • Dunn’s Test:
    • Control vs. Gain: Significant difference (p = 0.0007).
    • Control vs. Loss: Significant difference (p = 0.0001).
    • Gain vs. Loss: No significant difference (p = 1.0000).

Q3: Likelihood of Reducing Single-Use Cups

  • Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 5.233, df = 2, p = 0.072: No significant differences among conditions.

Q4: Likelihood of Bringing Reusable Cups

  • Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 8.761, df = 2, p = 0.012: Significant differences in likelihood of bringing reusable cups.
  • Dunn’s Test:
    • Control vs. Gain: No significant difference (p = 0.4809).
    • Control vs. Loss: Significant difference (p = 0.0054).
    • Gain vs. Loss: No significant difference (p = 0.0882).

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Loss-framed interventions are more effective in promoting reusable cup usage compared to control, but not significantly different from gain-framed messages.
  • Future research should explore combining different types of interventions with loss-framed messages for enhanced sustainability practices on campus.

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to Dr. Jiaying Zhao for her guidance and insights throughout this project.