Doesn't seem to work with sbt

[hertg]

I couldn't get this project to work properly with sbt.
I'm fairly certain that it has something to do with the Basic Auth, because you are forced to define a realm for the credentials in sbt, but this project doesn't return any.

curl https://maven.company.com -vv returns WWW-Authenticate: Basic instead of WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="some-realm-name"

I have already commented an open issue on sbt describing the problem (link)

However, i do believe that it would be fairly simple to just return a realm in this application.
Unfortunately, i wasn't able to do it myself, because i lack knowledge about JAX-RS.

[renaudcerrato]

Thanks for reporting. Indeed, adding a realm isn't that hard. I'll look into this asap!

[renaudcerrato]

We'd just need to add a login-config to the web.xml IMO :

<login-config>
        <auth-method>BASIC</auth-method>
        <realm-name>the_realm</realm-name>
    </login-config>

[hertg]

Thanks for the fast response!
I've actually already tried that, but it doesn't seem to work.
It's still returning WWW-Authenticate: Basic

[renaudcerrato]

Very weird. I'm AFK right now, will look into this asap.

[hertg]

It has to be in the <web-app> object, right? Here's my full web.xml:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<web-app xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee" version="2.5">


    <servlet>
        <servlet-name>jerseyServlet</servlet-name>

        <servlet-class>
            org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.ServletContainer
        </servlet-class>

        <init-param>
            <param-name>javax.ws.rs.Application</param-name>
            <param-value>repo.Application</param-value>
        </init-param>

        <load-on-startup>1</load-on-startup>
    </servlet>

    <servlet-mapping>
        <servlet-name>jerseyServlet</servlet-name>
        <url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>

    <security-constraint>
        <web-resource-collection>
            <web-resource-name>everything</web-resource-name>
            <url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
        </web-resource-collection>
        <user-data-constraint>
            <transport-guarantee>CONFIDENTIAL</transport-guarantee>
        </user-data-constraint>
    </security-constraint>

    <security-constraint>
        <web-resource-collection>
            <web-resource-name>/_ah/start</web-resource-name>
            <url-pattern>/_ah/start</url-pattern>
        </web-resource-collection>
        <user-data-constraint>
            <transport-guarantee>NONE</transport-guarantee>
        </user-data-constraint>
    </security-constraint>

    <login-config>
        <auth-method>BASIC</auth-method>
        <realm-name>my-realm-name</realm-name>
    </login-config>
</web-app>

btw. I've added the /_ah/start route to allow basic scaling in the Google App Engine. This route has to return 200 OK, it won't work otherwise.

[renaudcerrato]

Looks correct. So, still no realm?

[hertg]

No, unfortunately not

[hertg]

Well, I've got it working with a very dirty workaround.

I created the class repo/provider/ResponseServerFilter.java

package repo.provider;

import java.io.IOException;

import javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerRequestContext;
import javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerResponseContext;
import javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerResponseFilter;

public class ResponseServerFilter implements ContainerResponseFilter {

    @Override
    public void filter(ContainerRequestContext requestContext, ContainerResponseContext responseContext) throws IOException {
        responseContext.getHeaders().remove("WWW-Authenticate");
        responseContext.getHeaders().add("WWW-Authenticate", "Basic realm=\"my-realm-name\"");
    }

}

and registered it in repo/Application.java

public Application() throws IOException {
...
register(ResponseServerFilter.class);
...
}

So the server just automatically replaces the WWW-Authenticate header for every request.
That's a very dirty solution, and it would probably be a lot better to implement the Basic-Auth correctly.

I think some parts of the Basic-Auth implementation are a bit odd, because the login-config should theoretically work, from what i've found. Also, it looks a bit different from examples i've found online (?) (eg. https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24329_01/web.1211/e24983/secure.htm#RESTF113)

[renaudcerrato]

Weird....