From 8a350bfd394ff0d9babca60a20144c96f351c915 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: clarabachorz Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:10:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] corrected energy demand parameters for DRI-EAF process-based steel --- modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms b/modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms index 13a3f08bd..2cb5ae406 100644 --- a/modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms +++ b/modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms @@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ $ifthen.cm_subsec_model_steel "%cm_subsec_model_steel%" == "processes" !! carbon capture mass is given in tCO2 and converted to tC after that !! reduction: 504 m^3; heat 242 m^3; conversion: x / 11.126 m^3/kg * 0.0333 MWh/kg -p37_specFeDemTarget("feh2s","idr","h2") = 2.23 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Rechberger et al 2020, Section 4.2 (per tDRI) +p37_specFeDemTarget("feh2s","idr","h2") = 2.09 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Rechberger et al 2020, Section 4.2 (per tDRI) p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","idr","h2") = 0.08 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Hölling et al 2017, Just before Table 1 (per tHBI) p37_specFeDemTarget("fegas","idr","ng") = 2.69 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Hölling et al 2017, Page 7 (9.7 GJ) (per tHBI) @@ -614,8 +614,8 @@ p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","idr","ng") = 0.08 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga !! Birat2010, p. 11: 0.97 MWh total, only 0.44 MWh of which is electrical !! EU JRC BAT says 0.404–0.748 (only EAF, elec) / Otto et al. say 0.92 !! --> have declining curve? -p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","eaf","pri") = 0.67 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Copy from secondary (Agora Energiewende, 2022 give similar values, between w and w/o reheating) -p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","eaf","sec") = 0.67 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Vogl et al 2018, Section 3.1 +p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","eaf","pri") = 0.75 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Vogl et al 2018, Section 3.1 +p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","eaf","sec") = 0.67 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Vogl et al 2018, Section 3.1 / EAF from scrap requires less energy. !! Otto et al. Fig 3: 10.303 GJ coke (from 13.24 GJ coal, see Menendez2015 Fig 3) + 4.67 GJ coal dust -> 18 GJ !! Birat2010, p.11 says best performers have 17 GJ, out of which 16 GJ coal From 972a12801525a58975ae549d4db07acf02843c6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: clarabachorz Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:57:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Added casting and rolling electricity and heat demand to EAF --- modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms b/modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms index 2cb5ae406..b759be276 100644 --- a/modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms +++ b/modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms @@ -610,12 +610,17 @@ p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","idr","h2") = 0.08 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga p37_specFeDemTarget("fegas","idr","ng") = 2.69 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Hölling et al 2017, Page 7 (9.7 GJ) (per tHBI) p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","idr","ng") = 0.08 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Hölling et al 2017, Page 7 (9.7 GJ) (per tHBI) -!! To do: Does not include casting and rolling; +!! From Vogl et al 2018 (Section 3.1), primary DRI requires 0.75 MWh/t, and secondary DRI 0.67 MWh/t. +!! Casting and rolling requires an additional 0.01 and 0.105 MWh/t of electricity demand, respectively (IEA GHG 2013). +!! Casting and rolling also requires heat, which we assume to come from ng: 0.006 and 0.468 MWh/t, respectively (IEA GHG 2013) !! Birat2010, p. 11: 0.97 MWh total, only 0.44 MWh of which is electrical !! EU JRC BAT says 0.404–0.748 (only EAF, elec) / Otto et al. say 0.92 !! --> have declining curve? -p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","eaf","pri") = 0.75 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Vogl et al 2018, Section 3.1 -p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","eaf","sec") = 0.67 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Vogl et al 2018, Section 3.1 / EAF from scrap requires less energy. +p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","eaf","pri") = 0.87 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Vogl et al 2018, Section 3.1 and IEAGHG 2013, Vol 1 Section D Table D-13 and D-15 +p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","eaf","sec") = 0.79 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Vogl et al 2018, Section 3.1 and IEAGHG 2013, Vol 1 Section D Table D-13 and D-15 + +p37_specFeDemTarget("fegas","eaf","pri") = 0.47 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / IEA GHG 2013, Vol 1 Section D Table D-13 and D-15 +p37_specFeDemTarget("fegas","eaf","sec") = 0.47 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / IEA GHG 2013, Vol 1 Section D Table D-13 and D-15 !! Otto et al. Fig 3: 10.303 GJ coke (from 13.24 GJ coal, see Menendez2015 Fig 3) + 4.67 GJ coal dust -> 18 GJ !! Birat2010, p.11 says best performers have 17 GJ, out of which 16 GJ coal From 75e174f189c655d16db676e772e2860452856d2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: clarabachorz Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 16:01:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Corrected false POSTED value for H2 demand --- modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms b/modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms index b759be276..0590f5fcf 100644 --- a/modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms +++ b/modules/37_industry/subsectors/datainput.gms @@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ $ifthen.cm_subsec_model_steel "%cm_subsec_model_steel%" == "processes" !! carbon capture mass is given in tCO2 and converted to tC after that !! reduction: 504 m^3; heat 242 m^3; conversion: x / 11.126 m^3/kg * 0.0333 MWh/kg -p37_specFeDemTarget("feh2s","idr","h2") = 2.09 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Rechberger et al 2020, Section 4.2 (per tDRI) +p37_specFeDemTarget("feh2s","idr","h2") = 2.23 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Rechberger et al 2020, Section 4.2 (per tDRI) p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","idr","h2") = 0.08 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Hölling et al 2017, Just before Table 1 (per tHBI) p37_specFeDemTarget("fegas","idr","ng") = 2.69 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Hölling et al 2017, Page 7 (9.7 GJ) (per tHBI)