Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add missing procedures #4

Open
3 tasks
butlerx opened this issue Apr 9, 2017 · 6 comments
Open
3 tasks

add missing procedures #4

butlerx opened this issue Apr 9, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@butlerx
Copy link
Member

butlerx commented Apr 9, 2017

  • gpgkeys
  • pwsafe
  • useradm
@zergless
Copy link
Contributor

zergless commented Apr 9, 2017

whats missing?

@butlerx
Copy link
Member Author

butlerx commented Apr 9, 2017

see #7
possibly more

@VoyTechnology
Copy link
Contributor

I would personally call useradm an internal service. You execute procedures using the tool, but its not a procedure in itself.

@theycallmemac
Copy link
Member

What here actually needs to get added still? I feel there is little point adding anything useradm based as that was marked in it's own repo as legacy at one point.

pwsafe doc to include adding passwords and using the pwsafe I guess??

What is needed on gpg keys?

@butlerx
Copy link
Member Author

butlerx commented Oct 16, 2019

I dont entirely know where gpg keys are used in rb.

I'm unsure what we are currently using to manage users. Eg.

  • add
  • search
  • remove
    and so on these process should be upated as well as the new year process.

Pwsafe should have general instructions such as where it is and how to manage passwords, yes.

@theycallmemac
Copy link
Member

I think the only place i see keys enforced at the moment is on NixOS machines

Managing users is kind of a mix of things. I'm moving towards removing useradm as I can but progress is slow.

I'll get something together to add pwsafe instructions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants