We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
To have a little symmetry, can we rename Delivery to InboundMessage? And then AcknowledgeableDelivery could become AcknowledgeableInboundMessage.
Delivery
InboundMessage
AcknowledgeableDelivery
AcknowledgeableInboundMessage
I personally feel this would align better with OutboundMessage on the sending side.
OutboundMessage
Having a consistent nomenclature (inbound/outbound, publisher/subscriber, producer/consumer) will help people pick up the API and run with it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good point. Should go into 2.0, as it is a breaking change.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
To have a little symmetry, can we rename
Delivery
toInboundMessage
? And thenAcknowledgeableDelivery
could becomeAcknowledgeableInboundMessage
.I personally feel this would align better with
OutboundMessage
on the sending side.Motivation
Having a consistent nomenclature (inbound/outbound, publisher/subscriber, producer/consumer) will help people pick up the API and run with it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: