Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to current Ruby tools #46

Open
ploeh opened this issue Aug 26, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Update to current Ruby tools #46

ploeh opened this issue Aug 26, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@ploeh
Copy link

ploeh commented Aug 26, 2015

Very late to the game here, but I was originally drawn to this workshop via @jhannes, whom I met in Kiev where he hosted a dojo.

Now I'd like to host a similar event myself, but I'm having trouble getting the application to run. The fact that I'm on Windows probably doesn't help, but I've previously managed to get other Ruby-based programs running, including my own blog, which is created with Jekyll.

My other big disadvantage is that I'm not a Ruby programmer at all.

I've been asking about some of my issues on Stack Overflow, and I'm currently stuck with this one: http://stackoverflow.com/q/32228794/126014 From the answer provided so far, I understand that the main issue is that the code in the repo isn't compatible with current Ruby tools/dependencies.

If so, would it be possible to update the code base to current Ruby tools, or are there other attempts I can make of getting the current code base up and running?

I realise that this is software provided for free, so I completely understand if this is too big of an effort. On the other hand, if I don't ask, the answer is automatically no... 😄

@rchatley
Copy link
Owner

Hi Mark,

the project isn't really under active development, so it does use some
older versions of ruby and libraries. If you set up RVM then you should be
able to run it with a gemset that includes the older libraries.

I'm not sure about doing that on Windows, but you could run a linux VM
under Virtual box or similar.

If we get some spare time soon then we might try to upgrade to current
versions, but it's not high on the priority list to be honest...

cheers,
Robert

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Mark Seemann [email protected]
wrote:

Very late to the game here, but I was originally drawn to this workshop
via @jhannes https://github.com/jhannes, whom I met in Kiev where he
hosted a dojo
http://johannesbrodwall.com/2011/12/18/how-to-start-a-coding-dojo.

Now I'd like to host a similar event myself, but I'm having trouble
getting the application to run. The fact that I'm on Windows probably
doesn't help, but I've previously managed to get other Ruby-based programs
running, including my own blog http://blog.ploeh.dk, which is created
with Jekyll.

My other big disadvantage is that I'm not a Ruby programmer at all.

I've been asking about some of my issues on Stack Overflow, and I'm
currently stuck with this one: http://stackoverflow.com/q/32228794/126014
From the answer provided so far, I understand that the main issue is that
the code in the repo isn't compatible with current Ruby tools/dependencies.

If so, would it be possible to update the code base to current Ruby tools,
or are there other attempts I can make of getting the current code base up
and running?

I realise that this is software provided for free, so I completely
understand if this is too big of an effort. On the other hand, if I don't
ask, the answer is automatically no... [image: 😄]


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#46.

@ploeh
Copy link
Author

ploeh commented Aug 27, 2015

it's not high on the priority list to be honest.

Understood, and expected.

Can you share any hints about the RVM strategy? Or would it be 'straightforward'?

Thank you for taking the time to respond.

@rchatley
Copy link
Owner

The RVM docs (https://rvm.io/rvm/install) point to this tutorial
http://blog.developwithpassion.com/2012/03/30/installing-rvm-with-cygwin-on-windows/
but I haven't tried it as I'm not a Windows user.

My instinct is that setting up a VM might be a faster route to success -
but that's just a hunch.

--Robert

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Mark Seemann [email protected]
wrote:

it's not high on the priority list to be honest.

Understood, and expected.

Can you share any hints about the RVM strategy? Or would it be
'straightforward'?

Thank you for taking the time to respond.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#46 (comment)
.

@ploeh
Copy link
Author

ploeh commented Aug 27, 2015

Thank you, I'll look into it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants