You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A clear scope of what is in their purview/responsibility
This scope documented clearly and available to stakeholders
Communicated the above to stakeholders and have their buy-in/agreement
The ability to own incidents within their purview (i.e. not a requirement to engage central IRT)
Psych safety knowing that engaging central IRT is not considered a failure/punishment
Possible things to measure...
Number of incident responders involved per incident type/severity
Number/ratio of incidents that were detected/reported by a party outside the team and directed to central IRT due to lack of an understanding of "who owns this?"
Corollary: Number/ratio of incidents for which there was no clear ownership of the impacted system(s)
something about product ownership and reducing coordination-cost.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: