Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistency in get_molecular_hamiltonian() #66

Open
mafaldaramoa opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Inconsistency in get_molecular_hamiltonian() #66

mafaldaramoa opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@mafaldaramoa
Copy link

Hello,

I'm using the get_molecular_hamiltonian() method for H4, but the behavior is not being consistent from one execution to the next.

My application is VQE. The problem is that I want to store the optimized parameters, but not the Hamiltonian. However, when I evaluate the energy with the supposedly optimized parameters (obtained in a previous execution), the value is often suboptimal. I can't reproduce the ground state, because the parameters that should define it do not minimize the energy calculated with the Hamiltonian I obtain after I recreate the molecule.

Versions: pyscf 2.2.0, openfermion 1.5.1, openfermionpyscf 0.5

A very simple example of the variations in the Hamiltonian:

from openfermion import MolecularData
from openfermionpyscf import run_pyscf

r = 1.5
geometry = [('H', (0,0,0)), ('H', (0,0,r)), ('H', (0,0,2*r)), ('H', (0,0,3*r))]
basis = 'sto-3g'
multiplicity = 1
charge = 0
h4 = MolecularData(geometry,basis,multiplicity,charge,description='H4')
h4 = run_pyscf(h4,run_fci = True,run_ccsd = True)
print(h4.get_molecular_hamiltonian())

I won't post the full output as it's unnecessary, but I leave the last 10 lines for two different executions of the code above:

((7, 1), (6, 1), (6, 0), (3, 0)) 0.03730971574012655
((7, 1), (6, 1), (6, 0), (7, 0)) 0.22562069773706908
((7, 1), (7, 1), (1, 0), (1, 0)) 0.05498004656600459
((7, 1), (7, 1), (1, 0), (5, 0)) -0.0177711366810768
((7, 1), (7, 1), (3, 0), (3, 0)) 0.0588973786630837
((7, 1), (7, 1), (3, 0), (7, 0)) 0.03730971574012656
((7, 1), (7, 1), (5, 0), (1, 0)) -0.017771136681076806
((7, 1), (7, 1), (5, 0), (5, 0)) 0.08469509925466397
((7, 1), (7, 1), (7, 0), (3, 0)) 0.03730971574012655
((7, 1), (7, 1), (7, 0), (7, 0)) 0.22562069773706908
((7, 1), (6, 1), (6, 0), (3, 0)) -0.03730971574012662
((7, 1), (6, 1), (6, 0), (7, 0)) 0.22562069773706936
((7, 1), (7, 1), (1, 0), (1, 0)) 0.0549800465660047
((7, 1), (7, 1), (1, 0), (5, 0)) -0.017771136681076806
((7, 1), (7, 1), (3, 0), (3, 0)) 0.05889737866308378
((7, 1), (7, 1), (3, 0), (7, 0)) -0.037309715740126585
((7, 1), (7, 1), (5, 0), (1, 0)) -0.017771136681076813
((7, 1), (7, 1), (5, 0), (5, 0)) 0.08469509925466404
((7, 1), (7, 1), (7, 0), (3, 0)) -0.03730971574012662
((7, 1), (7, 1), (7, 0), (7, 0)) 0.22562069773706936
@ochapman-dphil
Copy link

getting the above error in 2024

@mafaldaramoa
Copy link
Author

@ochapman-dphil I suggest you take a look at this issue (the PySCF repository is significantly more active): pyscf/pyscf#1935

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants