Submit Qiskit results for https://metriq.info/Task/28

[1ucian0]

Once the submission for https://metriq.info/Task/25 (and related) is polished, it might be a good time for more complex tasks, such as https://metriq.info/Task/28

OPENQASM 2.0;
include "qelib1.inc";
qreg q[24];
cx q[3], q[2];
cx q[8], q[7];
cx q[14], q[13];
cx q[21], q[20];
cx q[3], q[4];
cx q[8], q[9];
cx q[14], q[15];
cx q[21], q[22];
ccx q[0], q[1], q[3];
ccx q[5], q[6], q[8];
ccx q[11], q[12], q[14];
ccx q[18], q[19], q[21];
ccx q[2], q[3], q[4];
ccx q[7], q[8], q[9];
ccx q[7], q[8], q[10];
ccx q[13], q[14], q[15];
ccx q[13], q[14], q[16];
ccx q[20], q[21], q[22];
ccx q[20], q[21], q[23];
cx q[6], q[5];
cx q[12], q[11];
cx q[19], q[18];
cx q[5], q[8];
cx q[11], q[14];
cx q[18], q[21];
ccx q[7], q[8], q[10];
ccx q[13], q[14], q[16];
ccx q[20], q[21], q[23];
ccx q[16], q[23], q[17];
ccx q[15], q[23], q[22];
ccx q[4], q[10], q[9];
ccx q[9], q[17], q[22];
ccx q[9], q[16], q[15];
ccx q[16], q[23], q[17];
ccx q[7], q[8], q[10];
ccx q[13], q[14], q[16];
ccx q[20], q[21], q[23];
cx q[5], q[8];
cx q[11], q[14];
cx q[18], q[21];
cx q[6], q[5];
cx q[12], q[11];
cx q[19], q[18];
ccx q[7], q[8], q[10];
ccx q[13], q[14], q[16];
ccx q[20], q[21], q[23];
ccx q[0], q[1], q[3];
ccx q[5], q[6], q[8];
ccx q[11], q[12], q[14];
ccx q[18], q[19], q[21];
cx q[3], q[2];
cx q[8], q[7];
cx q[14], q[13];
cx q[21], q[20];
cx q[6], q[5];
cx q[12], q[11];
cx q[19], q[18];
cx q[6], q[8];
cx q[12], q[14];
cx q[19], q[21];
cx q[4], q[6];
cx q[9], q[12];
cx q[15], q[19];
ccx q[0], q[1], q[3];
ccx q[5], q[6], q[8];
ccx q[11], q[12], q[14];
ccx q[18], q[19], q[21];
cx q[3], q[2];
cx q[8], q[7];
cx q[14], q[13];
cx q[21], q[20];
ccx q[0], q[1], q[3];
ccx q[5], q[6], q[8];
ccx q[11], q[12], q[14];
ccx q[18], q[19], q[21];
cx q[6], q[5];
cx q[12], q[11];
cx q[19], q[18];
cx q[4], q[6];
cx q[9], q[12];
cx q[15], q[19];
cx q[6], q[8];
cx q[12], q[14];
cx q[19], q[21];
cx q[1], q[0];
cx q[6], q[5];
cx q[12], q[11];
cx q[19], q[18];
x q[0];
x q[2];
x q[5];
x q[7];
x q[11];
x q[13];
cx q[3], q[2];
cx q[8], q[7];
cx q[14], q[13];
ccx q[0], q[1], q[3];
ccx q[5], q[6], q[8];
ccx q[11], q[12], q[14];
cx q[6], q[5];
cx q[12], q[11];
ccx q[7], q[8], q[10];
ccx q[13], q[14], q[16];
cx q[5], q[8];
cx q[11], q[14];
ccx q[7], q[8], q[10];
ccx q[13], q[14], q[16];
ccx q[9], q[16], q[15];
ccx q[4], q[10], q[9];
ccx q[7], q[8], q[10];
ccx q[13], q[14], q[16];
cx q[5], q[8];
cx q[11], q[14];
ccx q[7], q[8], q[10];
ccx q[13], q[14], q[16];
cx q[6], q[5];
cx q[12], q[11];
ccx q[7], q[8], q[9];
ccx q[13], q[14], q[15];
ccx q[2], q[3], q[4];
ccx q[0], q[1], q[3];
ccx q[5], q[6], q[8];
ccx q[11], q[12], q[14];
cx q[3], q[4];
cx q[8], q[9];
cx q[14], q[15];
cx q[3], q[2];
cx q[8], q[7];
cx q[14], q[13];
x q[0];
x q[2];
x q[5];
x q[7];
x q[11];
x q[13];

[karlaspuldaro]

Input file adder_8.qasm - originally published in https://github.com/inQWIRE/VOQC-benchmarks/blob/ed5acadee1da41d89535d29bcf95f3aa34c4c2ac/Arithmetic_and_Toffoli_partial/adder_8.qasm

[karlaspuldaro]

@vprusso @WrathfulSpatula
What would the best way to submit Qiskit compilation historical results for task 28? Seems like the chart is categorized by method not by date, all 2020 results:

[WrathfulSpatula]

@karlaspuldaro The x-axis type is conditional: since all results are from the same exact day, there is no time series. However, if additional data points are added with "result dates" besides the original date, the chart will automatically switch to the usual time series view.

(By the way, I'm trying to approve your submissions. However, I'll be transparent: I was hacked. As the AWS server keys were on my work machine, I immediately changed them. However, it's been a few days of digging out, and I think I need to redeploy the server with new keys, again. Luckily, we're not "enterprise scale," and there will be no data loss. However, it might take a little more time.)

[karlaspuldaro]

@WrathfulSpatula Oh ok it makes sense now, so we can just submit more data as usual then.

And sorry to hear about the hassle, totally understand any delays. The submissions approvals are not high priority for us, the charts are always updated regardless.