Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

__quantum__rt__bigint_bitnot: Consider documenting better #28

Open
kuzminrobin opened this issue Sep 15, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

__quantum__rt__bigint_bitnot: Consider documenting better #28

kuzminrobin opened this issue Sep 15, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@kuzminrobin
Copy link

In the name of __quantum__rt__bigint_bitnot the ending bitnot makes an impression that it is the bitwise negation. But the documentation says "bitwise complement", from which it is unclear whether it is a
Two's complement
or Ones' complement (equivalent to bitwise negation).

Consider documenting either as "bitwise negation" or "ones' complement".
If it is two's complement, then consider removing the word "bitwise" (I believe the two's complement is not a bitwise concept).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants