Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparison to Lightning Fabric and ignite #458

Open
ksachdeva opened this issue Jul 14, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Comparison to Lightning Fabric and ignite #458

ksachdeva opened this issue Jul 14, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@ksachdeva
Copy link

Hi,

I must say I like this little framework.

However, Lightning has something similar called Fabric and then there is this "ignite" framework with in Pytorch organization.

How do you tnt in comparison to them? What are some of the goals and non-goals?

Since it is part of official pytorch repo is there a certain level of commitment that it will be maintained and evolve

Regards
Kapil

@daniellepintz
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Kapil, thanks for your kind words and your questions!

The goal of TNT is to provide a lightweight training framework as well as standalone utilities which are agnostic to any training framework. We are able to keep the framework minimal by putting as much as possible into the standalone utilities (torchtnt/utils) rather than in the framework itself. This also allows users to benefit from the utils if they don’t wish to use the framework.

Compared to Lightning Fabric, TNT runs the training/evaluation/predict loop for the user.

Regarding level of commitment we have a dedicated team at Meta supporting this framework and evolving it to keep up with the latest advances in PyTorch and ML training.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants