You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The double colon is also highlighted in the former but not the latter.
EDIT: Also, if fields are highlighted specially on data type declaration, should they also be highlighted in pattern matches, and in record construction and update?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I suspect type might be highlighted differently because this grammar was ported from Haskell which doesn't have bare record types.
Worth pointing out I think that for the data case above in Atom I see 2 distinct colours for fields vs types, though on GitHub it's rendered as the same.
...has its fields names highlighted differently than...
The double colon is also highlighted in the former but not the latter.
EDIT: Also, if fields are highlighted specially on data type declaration, should they also be highlighted in pattern matches, and in record construction and update?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: