Note from upstream property documentation dropped #2260
Labels
kind/bug
Some behavior is incorrect or out of spec
Comments
VenelinMartinov
added
kind/bug
|
@VenelinMartinov Can you link a version pinned header close to the note we should be including. I couldn't find it in the upstream docs. |
|
Added it in pulumi/pulumi-gcp#2252. Seems related to markdown parsing. |
|
@guineveresaenger found as well pulumi/pulumi-snowflake#717 Suspecting pulumi/pulumi-aws#4921 orange-priority issue is caused by this too. The NOTE in the AWS case is nested (property level). |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
What happened?
We seem to omit notes from upstream property documentation in some cases: pulumi/pulumi-gcp#2252
We should investigate if this is a conflict with our markdown parsing of upstream docs, as these can be important, like in the above case.
Example
pulumi/pulumi-gcp#2252
Output of
pulumi about.
Additional context
No response
Contributing
Vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction.
To contribute a fix for this issue, leave a comment (and link to your pull request, if you've opened one already).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: