Search Confusion

[wind57]

If I want to search for a certain message and go to the search box and input either:

value.id==507566268 or id==507566268, I get zero results.

On the other hand, if I create a new filter and input the same code under "filter code": value.id==507566268, I do get the result. :|

How come?

One more question - what is the proper syntax for an array search? Cause nothing seems to work for me. I hoped:

users.foods[].id=123 would work.

[Haarolean]

Hi, please use discussions for questions instead of issues.

Search box is a simple search which works checks if either the key or the message contains the string from the input.

Filters are smart on the other hand, that's why they're called smart filters.

Regarding the array search, I don't think you can do something exact like this with groovy. You'll have to write a for loop instead.
But it's a good idea to support things like this via json paths, I've created an issue -- #2580

[wind57]

Hi, please use discussions for questions instead of issues

my bad. will do next time.

You'll have to write a for loop instead

can you point me to a minor sample please?

[Haarolean]

[wind57]

Search box is a simple search which works checks if either the key or the message contains the string from the input

that seems to work rather weird too :/

If I search for "name" -> it works.
If I search for "wind57" -> it works.

If I search for "name": "wind57" -> it does not. And of course such an entry exists

[wind57]

ah yes, you need to search without a space, pretty "obvious" :)

[iliax]

@wind57 I am not sure you using suggested code snipped properly.
filter is any valid groovy expression with value, key, valueAsText, keyAsText, timestampMs variables set.
here is sample (NOTE: this is current master image):

Messages in topic:

---

sample filters (both work as expected):

---

[wind57]

@iliax I was referring in my last comment:

ah yes, you need to search without a space, pretty "obvious" :)

about the non smart filter part. This issue was resolved for me.

---

The other issue I had was with groovy syntax, but it seems to again work for me now against a different payload. So overall, I think that everything is just fine. I'll ask again if I find something that does not work. thank you for your time.