Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[p5.js 2.0 RFC Proposal]: Be fully compatible with popular tools as Vite and Vercel #7423

Closed
3 of 21 tasks
ejgutierrez74 opened this issue Dec 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
3 of 21 tasks

Comments

@ejgutierrez74
Copy link

Increasing access

By now is a headache to get to work p5.js libraries in Vite, and when i got to work in Vite, then it doesnt work in Vercel...
So would be nice that same tutorial or examples would work in local vite, and Vercel.

Thanks

Which types of changes would be made?

  • Breaking change (Add-on libraries or sketches will work differently even if their code stays the same.)
  • Systemic change (Many features or contributor workflows will be affected.)
  • Overdue change (Modifications will be made that have been desirable for a long time.)
  • Unsure (The community can help to determine the type of change.)

Most appropriate sub-area of p5.js?

  • Accessibility
  • Color
  • Core/Environment/Rendering
  • Data
  • DOM
  • Events
  • Image
  • IO
  • Math
  • Typography
  • Utilities
  • WebGL
  • Build process
  • Unit testing
  • Internationalization
  • Friendly errors
  • Other (specify if possible)

What's the problem?

Make p5.js work in Vite and Vercel is a headache

What's the solution?

One way of working and writing code, fully compatible with Vite and Vercel

Pros (updated based on community comments)

  • Using standard of industry tools like vite, vercel

Cons (updated based on community comments)

None so far

Proposal status

Under review

@limzykenneth
Copy link
Member

@ejgutierrez74 This is already in the works and mostly done with #7013

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants