You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the issue Support for TeX/LaTeX files , I find that the actually work/function I need to do is add an new rules of dictionary for scientific writing, for e.g., I would like to add the ten rules mentioned here. I try to create a sciwrt.dic as follows:
#https://www.scribendi.com/advice/academic_phrases_your_writing_doesnt_need.en.html
/encoding=utf-8
On the other hand/!
In order to/!
Indeed/!
However\|moreover\|furthermore/!
As well as/!
For a short\|long period of time/!
By using/!
Due to the fact that/!
In relation to/!
In the event that/!
My questions are:
How to make this file work with the command Wordy sciwrt?
I want the rule works with ignoring the capital letter, which means, On the other hand/! will also mark on the other hand as a possible improvement.
Can I use the regular expression in the rule? such asHowever\|moreover\|furthermore/! will find However, moreover and furthermore in a single rule. Otherwise, I need to split it into three independent one.
Can I provide some suggestion for the word? I mean, if we use ]s to jump to a new suggestion, then can we use z= or something to give some suggestion/explanation of this improvement?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the issue Support for TeX/LaTeX files , I find that the actually work/function I need to do is add an new rules of dictionary for scientific writing, for e.g., I would like to add the ten rules mentioned here. I try to create a
sciwrt.dic
as follows:My questions are:
Wordy sciwrt
?On the other hand/!
will also markon the other hand
as a possible improvement.However\|moreover\|furthermore/!
will findHowever
,moreover
andfurthermore
in a single rule. Otherwise, I need to split it into three independent one.]s
to jump to a new suggestion, then can we usez=
or something to give some suggestion/explanation of this improvement?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: