Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
-
That sounds good to me. But this would only be helpful for compiling. I always explicitly set the target configuration for WinUAE in launch.json. So I can test my code, which was compiled for 68000, on a 68020 and also debug it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Good idea. An online document wich describe the option, in addition, will
be great.
בתאריך שבת, 20 באוג׳ 2022, 20:23, מאת Real-MJoe ***@***.***>:
… That sounds good to me. But this would only be helpful for compiling. I
always explicitly set the target configuration for WinUAE in launch.json.
So I can test my code, which was compiled for 68000, on a 68020 and also
debug it.
Yes, you have to create a handful of configs for WinUAE first, but I can
easily use them in other projects.
So I also have a config that displays the screen *2.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#236 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACCJAQQNOBAZQLIYY4XI5XTV2EH7ZANCNFSM57DL3EHA>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***
com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Somehow I don't see the advantage of keeping "fixed" configurations for WinUAE or FS-UAE. I can create these myself and integrate them accordingly. That is a big advantage of this extension, that I can use these configurations simply. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
After some discussion (with @phaze101) and questions as the last one from @C64HexCoder to add the fpu option.
A configuration helper seems to be an interesting new feature.
I don't know for now how it should look like, but before that, which minimal options do you think should be added?
At least I'm thinking of:
A helper will be added to the syntax checker (file build with vasm) with the options:
Some standard amiga:
Useful docs:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions