Command naming convention in the TOC

[waldekmastykarz]

It seems like we have an inconsistent way of listing commands in the Table of Contents in our docs:

If you look at the first three commands in the CLI group, we list just their name, without anything else, eg. we say consent and not cli consent. On the other hand, in the completion group, we prefix each name with the group name, eg. completion clink update. From the consistency point of view, shouldn't we use clink update instead as the group is indicated by the parent group? Dropping the group name from the TOC would not only shorten the display name but improve readability as you could more easily lookup the necessary command without having to continuously skip the first part.

What do you think?

[appieschot]

Makes sense for the completion commands, but will make things harder to read for commands like contenttype add as there are a lot of add commands. So perhaps we can say all commands that are two words are written as is, and all commands that are three words will be stripped of the group prefix?