-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
/
03-00-CantorsParadox.tex
48 lines (40 loc) · 2 KB
/
03-00-CantorsParadox.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{pmmeta}
\pmcanonicalname{CantorsParadox}
\pmcreated{2013-03-22 13:04:39}
\pmmodified{2013-03-22 13:04:39}
\pmowner{Henry}{455}
\pmmodifier{Henry}{455}
\pmtitle{Cantor's paradox}
\pmrecord{6}{33488}
\pmprivacy{1}
\pmauthor{Henry}{455}
\pmtype{Definition}
\pmcomment{trigger rebuild}
\pmclassification{msc}{03-00}
\endmetadata
% this is the default PlanetMath preamble. as your knowledge
% of TeX increases, you will probably want to edit this, but
% it should be fine as is for beginners.
% almost certainly you want these
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
% used for TeXing text within eps files
%\usepackage{psfrag}
% need this for including graphics (\includegraphics)
%\usepackage{graphicx}
% for neatly defining theorems and propositions
%\usepackage{amsthm}
% making logically defined graphics
%%%\usepackage{xypic}
% there are many more packages, add them here as you need them
% define commands here
%\PMlinkescapeword{theory}
\begin{document}
\emph{Cantor's paradox} demonstrates that there can be no largest cardinality. In particular, there must be an unlimited number of infinite cardinalities. For suppose that $\alpha$ were the largest cardinal. Then we would have $|\mathcal{P}(\alpha)|=|\alpha|$. (Here $\mathcal{P}(\alpha)$ denotes the power set of $\alpha$.) Suppose $f:\alpha\rightarrow\mathcal{P}(\alpha)$ is a bijection proving their equicardinality. Then $X=\{\beta\in\alpha\mid \beta\not\in f(\beta)\}$ is a subset of $\alpha$, and so there is some $\gamma\in\alpha$ such that $f(\gamma)=X$. But $\gamma\in X\leftrightarrow\gamma\notin X$, which is a paradox.
The key part of the argument strongly resembles Russell's paradox, which is in some sense a generalization of this paradox.
Besides allowing an unbounded number of cardinalities as ZF set theory does, this paradox could be avoided by a few other tricks, for instance by not allowing the construction of a power set or by adopting paraconsistent logic.
%%%%%
%%%%%
\end{document}