Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Future of svemix #55

Open
pixelmund opened this issue Aug 4, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Future of svemix #55

pixelmund opened this issue Aug 4, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@pixelmund
Copy link
Owner

Describe the bug

The new routing changes in kit will probably change the future of svemix.

I've just managed to avoid generating the page endpoints in #54 and i'm a little bit frustrated now because the new routing proposal would make svemix kinda obsolete. I love svemix because you can write your server code directly inside your svelte files.

I see a few ways to continue svemix

  • Fork SvelteKit before the new routing changes and try to be up to date with any changes in kit unrelated to routing.
  • Change svemix to use the new folder-based routing.
  • Discontinue svemix

Your Example Website or App

Steps to Reproduce the Bug or Issue

Expected behavior

Screenshots or Videos

Platform

Additional context

No response

@pixelmund pixelmund pinned this issue Aug 4, 2022
@trasherdk
Copy link

You are not alone in feeling frustrated. The change will obsolete most youtube tutorials, a shitload of github repositories.
I will discontinue my experiments, until that thing has settled.

@yousufiqbal
Copy link

I've an advice that may sound funny. But I think this sort of project should be based upon svelte not sveltekit. Also the current routing changes in sveltekit has created a room for a sveltekit competitor framework. I love SvelteKit but many including me would also welcome a new SvelteKit alternative. Just think about it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants