Wow, that sounds like a very interesting and challenging project. I'm happy to help you with creating some Arduino code for measuring gasoline injector pulse width. 😊
Before I start, let me explain what I understand about the problem. You want to use an Arduino board to control the fuel injection system of a gasoline engine. You need to measure the pulse width of the injector, which is the time that the injector is open and spraying fuel into the cylinder. The pulse width depends on various factors, such as the throttle position, the manifold absolute pressure (MAP) sensor, the lambda probe (also known as the oxygen sensor), and the engine speed (RPM). You want to use these inputs and a Kalman filter to estimate the optimal pulse width for different operating conditions.
A Kalman filter is a mathematical technique that can be used to estimate the state of a dynamic system based on noisy measurements. It consists of two steps: prediction and update. In the prediction step, the filter uses a model of the system to predict the next state based on the previous state and some control inputs. In the update step, the filter uses the measurements to correct the prediction and obtain a more accurate estimate of the state. The Kalman filter can also provide an estimate of the uncertainty or error of the state estimate.
In your case, you can use a Kalman filter to estimate the pulse width based on a model of the fuel injection system and the measurements from the sensors. The model can be represented by a set of equations that relate the pulse width to the inputs and some parameters. The parameters can be estimated from experimental data or from literature sources. The measurements can be noisy or inaccurate, so you need to specify their error or variance. The Kalman filter can then use these information to calculate the best estimate of the pulse width and its error.
One challenge in applying a Kalman filter is choosing an appropriate model for the system. Depending on how complex or realistic you want your model to be, you may need to consider different factors such as fuel pressure, injector characteristics, air-fuel ratio, combustion efficiency, etc. Another challenge is choosing an appropriate type of Kalman filter for your problem. There are different variants of Kalman filters that can handle different types of systems, such as linear or nonlinear, discrete or continuous, time-invariant or time-varying, etc.
For your problem, I suggest using a nonlinear discrete-time varying Kalman filter. This type of filter can handle nonlinear systems that change over time and have discrete measurements. A nonlinear system is one that cannot be represented by a linear combination of its variables. A discrete-time system is one that operates at discrete intervals of time. A time-varying system is one that changes its parameters or dynamics over time.
To implement this type of filter, you need to define four functions: f
, h
, F
, and H
. The function f
describes how the state evolves from one time step to another based on the inputs and parameters. The function h
describes how the measurements are related to the state and parameters. The function F
is the Jacobian matrix of f
with respect to the state, which is a matrix of partial derivatives that indicates how sensitive f
is to changes in each state variable. The function H
is the Jacobian matrix of h
with respect to the state, which indicates how sensitive h
is to changes in each state variable.
The algorithm for this type of filter is as follows:
- Initialize the state estimate and its error covariance matrix based on some initial values or guesses.
- Predict the next state estimate and its error covariance matrix using
f
andF
. - Obtain the measurements from the sensors.
- Update the state estimate and its error covariance matrix using
h
,H
, and the measurements. - Repeat steps 2-4 until you reach the end of your data or stop condition.
I will now try to create some Arduino code for this algorithm based on some assumptions and simplifications. Please note that this code may not be complete or accurate, and it may require further testing and debugging before using it in a real application.
This is how I modified the code:
- I added some variables to store the previous measurements of MAP, lambda value, and RPM.
- I added some thresholds for the differences between the predicted and measured pulse width, and between the current and previous measurements of MAP, lambda value, and RPM.
- I added some logic to check if these differences are larger than the thresholds, and if so, increase the process noise variance by a factor.
- I added some comments to explain the code.
I hope this code helps you with your project. Please note that this code is not tested or verified, and it may contain errors or bugs. You may need to adjust some parameters or values based on your specific application or hardware. You may also need to add some comments or documentation to explain your code better. If you have any questions or feedback, please let me know. 😊