You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that in the current remind2 FE|Transport reporting the variable names differ in the complex version from the edge_esm version (see here), which also leads to some inconsistencies when you use them further in the reporting. For example, FE|Transport|Pass|ESD|+|Liquids is not existent in edge_esm. We probably should adapt the edge_esm FE variables to the current (new) complex FE variables introduced by Renato after the merge.
Cheers,
Felix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Well, REMIND has now this all-encompassing FE variable vm_demFeSector which features SE type, FE type, sector and emissions market. On the total transport level you can just go with this one (should be the same as in complex here. However, on the sub-level with the distinction passenger/freight etc. might get more complicated and we would need to know which subsector goes into the ETS sector and which into ESD sector.
Hi Marianna, Alois,
I noticed that in the current remind2 FE|Transport reporting the variable names differ in the
complex
version from theedge_esm
version (see here), which also leads to some inconsistencies when you use them further in the reporting. For example,FE|Transport|Pass|ESD|+|Liquids
is not existent in edge_esm. We probably should adapt the edge_esm FE variables to the current (new) complex FE variables introduced by Renato after the merge.Cheers,
Felix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: