You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If you create a SpecimenWrapper from a blank occurrence ID, the returned occurrence ID is urn:catalog:::. This is because the current code constructs a
Should we include the basisOfRecord in the label as well?
Would that help reduce potential ambiguity, or just bake additional information into the label? I'd be in favor of the former, but don't think the latter needs to our should be a goal.
If you create a SpecimenWrapper from a blank occurrence ID, the returned occurrence ID is
urn:catalog:::
. This is because the current code constructs aThis is because:
occurrenceID
attempts to construct a Darwin Core triple from the relevant fields, but these are empty.Specimen {occurrenceID}
We should change this such that:
urn:catalog:::
prefix -- we should only return the raw occurrence ID.Specimen {occurrenceID}
, but only if occurrenceID is not blank.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: