Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test for some common invalid phyloreferences #223

Open
2 tasks
gaurav opened this issue Nov 10, 2021 · 2 comments
Open
2 tasks

Test for some common invalid phyloreferences #223

gaurav opened this issue Nov 10, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
difficulty: easy Should be easy to do (1-2 days) programming only No discussion necessary; just pure programming needed user interface Issues involving the user interface. Suggests that further iteration might be necessary.
Milestone

Comments

@gaurav
Copy link
Member

gaurav commented Nov 10, 2021

At a minimum, we should test for:

  • The same taxonomic unit should not be both included and excluded from a particular phyloreference.
  • (any other suggestions?)
@gaurav gaurav added programming only No discussion necessary; just pure programming needed difficulty: easy Should be easy to do (1-2 days) labels Nov 10, 2021
@gaurav gaurav added this to the Klados v1.0 milestone Nov 10, 2021
@gaurav
Copy link
Member Author

gaurav commented Mar 30, 2022

  • Remind users when something isn't filled in, e.g. clade definition, maybe on the Summary page.
  • Might be useful to have a "completion" helper at the top of the page -- "You did not enter a definition for ..."

@gaurav
Copy link
Member Author

gaurav commented Aug 24, 2022

Need to be made finite.

@gaurav gaurav added the user interface Issues involving the user interface. Suggests that further iteration might be necessary. label Feb 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
difficulty: easy Should be easy to do (1-2 days) programming only No discussion necessary; just pure programming needed user interface Issues involving the user interface. Suggests that further iteration might be necessary.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant