Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Masscan #264

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 13, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Add Masscan #264

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 13, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Evaluate adding Masscan to the Image. 
https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan


While there are a number of port scanners on the image there are none quite 
this fast and flexible. It works wonders for things like CVE-2014-0160. Nmap 
detection was slow and painful while scanning our internal /8 (Think 
University), Masscan was able to tackle the /8 in 20 minutes while being rather 
successful at identifying bad hosts.

I know as an attack tool it's easily blocked/slowed down but I don't believe it 
is so wide spreed that many of the larger blocks are stopping it at this point. 
On a red team it's a quick picture of the attack surface.


It should be noted this tool has wide spread adoption in the world of higher 
education. 





What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Masscan will become a default installed app.



***Picture of me assaulting a clown to follow.


Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 12 May 2014 at 2:43

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

it's not in Pentoo iso by default, but we have added to the overlay. You can 
just run "emerge masscan" and start using it.

Original comment by blshkv on 13 May 2014 at 2:05

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

1.) this bug is about do we want it on the live cd
2.) please stop forking gentoo ebuilds into the pentoo overlay.  remove masscan 
from pentoo and open a gentoo bug if you have any fixes.

Original comment by sidhayn on 15 May 2014 at 7:45

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I did not fork it for nothing. The bug report is opened for 2 years:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366609

Our fork supports that kernel module optionally.

Original comment by blshkv on 16 May 2014 at 12:20

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510482

Enjoy ;-)

Original comment by blshkv on 16 May 2014 at 12:23

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant