You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When creating a FM that takes more than one variable as input, we need the two encodings not to commute with each other. If the config is passed directly to QNN.from_configs() then an entangling layer is placed in between, and all works. It's not the case if one passes it to the QuantumCircuit.
n-toscano
changed the title
MultivariateStrategy.SERIES has different behaviors when passed to circuit or directly to QNN
[Bug] MultivariateStrategy.SERIES has different behaviors when passed to circuit or directly to QNN
Nov 11, 2024
Short description
When creating a FM that takes more than one variable as input, we need the two encodings not to commute with each other. If the config is passed directly to
QNN.from_configs()
then an entangling layer is placed in between, and all works. It's not the case if one passes it to theQuantumCircuit
.What is the expected result?
No response
What is the actual result?
No response
Steps/Code to reproduce
vs
Tracebacks (optional)
No response
Environment details (optional)
No response
Would you like to work on this issue?
Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: