-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature] Computing partial trace outputs for statevectors and density matrices #367
Comments
@rajaiitp Could you please be more specific about the mathematical formulation of these ? Thanks. |
here sqrt is defined as diagonalize, sqrt and undiagonalize
|
Hey @rajaiitp could you please make sure the formulae above are correct ? Thanks. |
In my opinion, this could go with the introduction of a |
@Roland-djee yes the formulae above are correct, just edited some brackets, didnt know we had support for latex on here. I dont know what a Result type is |
Yeah no worries, it is just an idea for us internally to handle what you suggested. |
This should be added to backend utils - and should be resolved in qadence 2. Refinement on implementation details is needed. @rajaiitp Can you help us define the priority of this issue? Is it needed urgently? |
Rarely used. Its just a property of the state that sometimes people care to look into. (probably used once or twice so far at best) |
It would nice to have basic density matrix related functionalities that are part of basic quantum information theory computations (partial trace, entropy, fidelity, purity..)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: