-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 231
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Go module support #207
Comments
Any workaround on this until new version will fix? |
I'm wondering the same thing @frederikhors any update here @grawlinson ? More generally, what's the proposed method for installing dependencies that should be available for development as a binary accessible via command line? For example in |
Filed a PR. Up to the maintainers now. |
Any news? |
Unfortunately no, I would consider this project abandoned and look elsewhere for alternatives.
|
@grawlinson Have you found a substitute? Could you share the name please? |
I have yet to find a replacement, sadly. |
Maybe https://github.com/markbates/refresh does the job for you. Not as many features though but works very well. |
@dhax Thx! I'll try it after my holiday. |
Does she support Go Mod now ? |
No, the author has essentially abandoned this project. |
@grawlinson it seems that master branch supports modules now. Could new release be made because of this? I think it's pretty big change. |
That's up to the contributors with write access to the repository, I strongly suggest looking for an alternative task runner. |
Oops sorry, I thought you are contributor. |
It would be nice if Go modules were supported, now that
1.11
has been released. This would basically deprecate the use ofdep
in favour of nativego mod
.A good start would be replacing
Gopkg.toml
withgo.mod
andgo.sum
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: