RaspberryPi alternative? #189
-
Given that the pricing and supply issues with these devices, can this solution be implemented with another similarly-performing single board PC? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 11 replies
-
Did you read the great report of rkosick in Where have you been traveling together with Little Backup Box? ? He used a Raspberry Pi Zero 2W in combination with a Zero4U 4-Port USB Hub. This looks like a great combination, roundabout at half the price of a pi 4. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Now I installed lbb on an old Raspberry Pi 2 Model B Rev 1.1. Everything works fine, even the display. On backup from USB to internal I got transfer-rates from 10 to 13 MB/s. 64 GB should be copied in 1:30 hours. No one of the actual models of the pi should be as slow as this one. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This again looks like a power-shortage. lbb uses the first connected device as target, the next as source. After connecting the first USB-device, linux assigns a LUM-alpha to it, let's say sda. The next device will get sdb. If sda disconnects (maybe because of low voltage), next time it will not be assigned as sda again but as sdc. Now sdb is target, sdc is source - opposite direction. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Did you read the great report of rkosick in Where have you been traveling together with Little Backup Box? ? He used a Raspberry Pi Zero 2W in combination with a Zero4U 4-Port USB Hub. This looks like a great combination, roundabout at half the price of a pi 4.
It's to expect, newer functions like creating thumbnails from raw-fotos would be significant slower. There is just a discussion about transfer speed.. Maybe the disadvantage of USB 2.0 vs. 3.0 is by far not as relevant as it seems. This means, a pi zero or pi 3 might be a good alternative.
There are no reports about some alternatives like orange pi...