Paketo Project Specification #17
ForestEckhardt
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
@ekcasey made an interesting point about documentation vs. specification in the CNB working group meeting the other day that I think is also relevant here. I'll hold off on paraphrasing if you want to chime in here, Emily. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Recently we have merged some RFCs that layout some specifics for the Paketo Project such as:
We have also had discussions about layout of set of guidelines as to what is required to be a core Paketo buildpack. These things feel like they could benefit from being part large Paketo project specification.
I am curious to hear peoples thoughts on this idea as well as some other things that they may want added to a Paketo specification.
An example of an addition might be something like respect
build
andlaunch
flags inside of build plans across the whole project.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions