-
Hello there, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 6 comments 2 replies
-
@jhossbach I guess I would have thought that Is the suggestion that I don't really have a strong opinion on this, but willing to hear other ideas, opinions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@jhossbach Well, yes, I don't really view "what Pandas does" as a useful guide for handling numerical data. In fact, I would say that "Exhibit A" for the case to not follow Pandas is that they chose to (mis)use IEEE Do we need to make
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@jhossbach Well, numpy comes with a few methods, and then you have to use
so, maybe doing And you do probably really want to know which fits did not have uncertainties calculated, right? I guess I'm not sure there is a compelling argument to change the library as opposed to expecting downstream code to use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am not in favor of making that change as it will -I think at least- break all existing code that checks for the presence of
if that's indeed the case then I don't support making a change given the discussion above. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I also have a lot of code which does |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@jhossbach @Tillsten @reneeotten OK, looks like we're not going to change this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@jhossbach @Tillsten @reneeotten OK, looks like we're not going to change this.