Jamulus with 32 or lower frame size instead of just 64,128 & 256 #2844
Replies: 3 comments 12 replies
-
The protocol doesn't support that. You'd need to release new versions of the client and server that could translate between the existing frame size and the new frame size, like it currently does for 64 <-> 128 samples. And, similarly, only when both client and server had the option enabled, would you get end to end support. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @Meemansa-Mishra Note: You can use JACK to lower audio buffer size, but the question is if that introduces side-effects: #2844 (reply in thread) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
And remember, like @DavidSavinkoff points out, the difference between 64 samples and 32 samples is 6.75 inches. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I am trying to run Jamulus with a decreased frame size to acheive lower latency but have been unable to do this.I would appreciate any kind of support in trying to get it down to 32 or less.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions