Meeting Minutes and OVAL test usage spreadsheet 09-26-2024 Monthly Meeting #159
Closed
vanderpol
announced in
Announcements
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
@OVAL-Community/oval-board-members
OVAL Board - Future of OVAL monthly meetings
September 26, 2024
Attended participants 15
Vanderpol, Jack R CIV USN NIWC ATLANTIC SC (USA)
Harris, Daniel Keith CIV USN NIWC ATLANTIC SC (USA)
Eduardo B. (Canonical) (Unverified)
Tim Rosner (Unverified)
Dragos Prisaca (Unverified)
Richard Maciel (Unverified)
Boris Iordanov (CIS) (Unverified)
Stephen Banghart (Unverified)
Evgenii Kolesnikov (Unverified)
Adam Biggs (Unverified)
David Solin (Unverified)
Alleman, Brady G CTR DISA EIIC (USA) (External)
Anurag-HCL (Unverified)
Steven (UC) (Unverified)
Richard Maciel (Unverified)
Notes:
Provided a OVAL Language Management Update
Voted on and received approval OVAL board member nominations from
▪Dragos Prisaca from NIST
▪Boris Iordanov from CIS (replacing Justin Burr)
▪Jamaal Spearman from DISA
▪Brady Alleman from DISA
▪Daniel Harris from NIWC
▪John Ulmer from NIWC
Provided a SCAP 3.0 update with schedule
Voted on and received approval for usage of Github Discussions as a replacement of email listserver
Voted on and received approval for removing unused repositories in OVAL-Community (OVAL-6-WG, Repo-Meta-WG, Authoring-API)
Received approval to proceed with OVAL 5.12 and OVAL 6.0, further discussions required on branch vs repository
Suspended existing approval process for the time being, given hard deadlines of 30 Nov 2024 to complete OVAL 5.12 and OVAL 6.0. Single implementation and majority vote will suffice until this round of development stabilizes.
Voted on and approved reverting OVAL versioning away from platform versioning, and back to flat/simple versioning for all files.
Discussed potential changes for 5.12
a. Additional discussions/votes for each high level change coming soon via Github Discussions
OVAL 6.0 definition changes discussed, further discussions and voting required.
a. Pros and cons were discussed
Discussed NIWC’s prototype tool to convert SCAP 1.3 to 3.0 format, and demonstrated an example definition from 5.11.2 and draft 6.0
Digital signatures were discussed, stating that it was strongly recommended to verify digital signatures of content going forward, especially those using new shellcommand, powershellcommand and SQL tests.
Action Items:
OVAL_Test_Usage_in_Public_Content_Sept_2024.xlsx
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions