You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Another reason CouchDB uses MVCC is that this model is simpler conceptually and, as
a consequence, easier to program. CouchDB uses less code to make this work, and less
code is always good because the ratio of defects per lines of code is static.
I do not think that this is expressed very well.
The number of lines of code is not necessarily correlated with the number of defects, and that ratio can change over time (hopefully approaching 0). A better way to express this paragraph might go something like this:
Another reason CouchDB uses MVCC is that this model is simpler conceptually and, as
a consequence, easier to program. CouchDB uses less code to make this work, and that
means fewer opportunities for defects (or bugs) to exist.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm going through the online draft and noticed this comment at http://guide.couchdb.org/draft/api.html (just before Documents in Detail):
I do not think that this is expressed very well.
The number of lines of code is not necessarily correlated with the number of defects, and that ratio can change over time (hopefully approaching 0). A better way to express this paragraph might go something like this:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: