You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Ideally we would expose the number of terms so a user can configure them, and we would have a reliable example calculation to use as a test case where, if you don't use the full P/Q series, the test would fail because the impedance is not calculated precisely enough.
One possible approach would be to expose a FullCarsons and ModifiedCarsons, which is how the Kersting source describes the simplification of taking only the first 1--2 terms of P/Q. The ModifiedCarsons model is needed for all cable calculations, since it can be formulated to not rely on having a y position. An overhead line can be supported by both the Full and Modified carsons equations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the Carsons model always uses a truncated expansion for computing the P/Q terms at each i/j combination:
carsons/carsons/carsons.py
Line 139 in d58461d
Ideally we would expose the number of terms so a user can configure them, and we would have a reliable example calculation to use as a test case where, if you don't use the full P/Q series, the test would fail because the impedance is not calculated precisely enough.
One possible approach would be to expose a
FullCarsons
andModifiedCarsons
, which is how the Kersting source describes the simplification of taking only the first 1--2 terms of P/Q. TheModifiedCarsons
model is needed for all cable calculations, since it can be formulated to not rely on having a y position. An overhead line can be supported by both the Full and Modified carsons equationsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: