Update en.json to fix typos

[Popolechien]

General copyediting.

[benoit74]

In general, it is probably way better, I do not have sufficient English level to assess this in details.

I'm however disturbed by the way we name the "final outcome". Sometimes we call it a ZIM (e.g. in ZIM requested!), sometimes a zim file, sometimes a .zim file.

On a personal basis, I tend to prefer ZIM, or .zim file if ZIM is too short / imprecise / confusing. I find that ZIM file is too long, zim file does not match our convention of using uppercase letters. .zim file looks a bit ugly to me (but it is the most precise one). And we must not forget this is going to be translated, so the simplest, the best from my PoV.

@kelson42 any views to share on this?

[benoit74]

And is this the only fix needed regarding #93 or just "preparatory" work?

[Popolechien]

Not fully addressing #93, and yes I'm equally undecided on the .zim/ZIM thing.

[benoit74]

@kelson42 up, we need to make a decision on this wording and I know it is important for you if I'm not mistaken

[kelson42]

@kelson42 up, we need to make a decision on this wording and I know it is important for you if I'm not mistaken

Thank you for asking, the answer is straight and there is only one: this is a "ZIM" file.

[benoit74]

@Popolechien can you update your PR accordingly (using ZIM file everywhere) or do you wanna help on this?

[Popolechien]

@benoit74 Done. But this here is my first time ever changing a PR, so do make sure I did the right thing at the right place.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 46.11%. Comparing base (0e59ae5) to head (2a9c1f5).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #101   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   46.11%   46.11%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         386      386           
  Branches       44       44           
=======================================
  Hits          178      178           
  Misses        206      206           
  Partials        2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[benoit74]

Thanks, it was almost OK, just had to also fix automated tests which are based on these strings because they were now failing. But this is clearly a bit tricky. Thanks!