-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[GitHub Request] Add necessary secrets to publish Remote Metadata Client Snapshots #254
Comments
Pending this until the repo is public. |
Hey @peterzhuamazon not sure what happened here.
I could probably edit files in place on the main repo but that seems wrong. I might be able to delete my fork and re-fork it (possibly to a private fork?) which might fix things, but I don't really want to blow up a whole repo for just an admin flip-it-private switch. Any thoughts here? |
Deleting my fork and re-forking did the trick. (Although closed an open PR when the source branch/repo was deleted. 😦) |
I'm 99.9% convinced that flipping that repo private broke something with GitHub Actions.
Possibilities:
|
Working on make the repo public properly. |
Repo public, will check on the maven snapshot next week. |
Thanks for the help! Snapshot workflow currently failing on fetching the creds, let's give it the weekend to see if it just needs time to replicate something somewhere... |
What is the type of request?
Secret Update
Details of the request
Please enable the necessary secrets to https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-remote-metadata-sdk to enable the snapshot publication workflow:
This appears to be
PUBLISH_SNAPSHOTS_ROLE
required by this step:Additional information to support your request
The following artifacts will be published:
When does this request need to be completed?
ASAP. This publication is currently blocking these two PRs, targeted for 2.19.0
Notes
Track the progress of your request here: https://github.com/orgs/opensearch-project/projects/208/views/33.
Member of @opensearch-project/admin will take a look at the request soon.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: