Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for clarification: imp.bidfloor vs deal.bidfloor #25

Open
Crystark opened this issue Sep 1, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Request for clarification: imp.bidfloor vs deal.bidfloor #25

Crystark opened this issue Sep 1, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@Crystark
Copy link

Crystark commented Sep 1, 2016

Hi,

I would like some clarification on this matter: if both imp.bidfloor and deal.bidfloor are set, should one be taking into account the highest or should the deal.bidfloor prevail ?
My understanding was that there can be various use case and overrides from different parties so one should always take everything into account (so take the highest).

Thanks

@markhu
Copy link

markhu commented Jun 28, 2017

Good question. The examples in the OpenRTB spec all showed bidfloor larger in the deals than in the imp so that doesn't help. But I think the best clue is the "at" (auction type) field, described as

Optional override of the overall auction type of the bid
request, where 1 = First Price, 2 = Second Price Plus, 3 = the
value passed in bidfloor is the agreed upon deal price.
Additional auction types can be defined by the exchange.

In short, it sounds like the answer varies depending on the "at" value.

@Crystark
Copy link
Author

Thanks for this answer. I understand that at=3 will indictate a fixed price but in case of at=1 or at=2 it isn't clear what one should do.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants