[PRE REVIEW]: Fortuna.jl: Structural and System Reliability Analysis in Julia #6931

editorialbot · 2024-06-26T18:25:08Z

Submitting author: @AkchurinDA (Damir Akchurin)
Repository: https://github.com/AkchurinDA/Fortuna.jl
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): JOSS
Version: V0.10.0
Editor: @jbytecode
Reviewers: @baxmittens, @rafaelorozco
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9df63bb9d4f1722272f85a0fc2249856"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9df63bb9d4f1722272f85a0fc2249856/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9df63bb9d4f1722272f85a0fc2249856/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/9df63bb9d4f1722272f85a0fc2249856)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @AkchurinDA. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@AkchurinDA if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

editorialbot · 2024-06-26T18:25:10Z

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot · 2024-06-26T18:25:34Z

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108327 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101204 is OK
- 10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108210 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.03349 is OK
- 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000002 is OK
- 10.18637/jss.v098.i16 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.05161 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1108/JSFE-07-2016-0010 is OK
- 10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.03.002 is OK
- 10.48550/ARXIV.1607.07892 is OK
- 10.21105/joss.06189 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.008 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: A Review of Recent Features and Improvements Added...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Turing: A Language for Flexible Probabilistic Infe...

INVALID DOIs

- None

editorialbot · 2024-06-26T18:25:43Z

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.08 s (1046.2 files/s, 117581.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia                           46            980            982           3280
SVG                              3              0              0           1813
Markdown                        22            446              0           1229
TeX                              2             24              0            328
YAML                             7              0              3            185
TOML                             2              4              0             39
CSS                              1              2              6              7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            83           1456            991           6881
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   207	Damir Akchurin
    15	CompatHelper Julia
    14	AkchurinDA
     2	dependabot[bot]

editorialbot · 2024-06-26T18:25:47Z

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 990

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

editorialbot · 2024-06-26T18:25:50Z

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

editorialbot · 2024-06-26T18:26:17Z

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

editorialbot · 2024-06-26T18:27:02Z

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

Copulas.jl: A fully Distributions.jl-compliant copula package
Submitting author: @lrnv
Handling editor: @osorensen (Active)
Reviewers: @lucaferranti, @AnderGray
Similarity score: 0.7982

GaussianRandomFields.jl: A Julia package to generate and sample from Gaussian random fields
Submitting author: @PieterjanRobbe
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @shahmoradi
Similarity score: 0.7789

GlobalSensitivity.jl: Performant and Parallel Global Sensitivity Analysis with Julia
Submitting author: @Vaibhavdixit02
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @zhenwu0728, @storyetfall
Similarity score: 0.7659

POMDPStressTesting.jl: Adaptive Stress Testing for Black-Box Systems
Submitting author: @mossr
Handling editor: @sbenthall (Active)
Reviewers: @jarvist, @sambitdash
Similarity score: 0.7448

GeoStats.jl -- High-performance geostatistics in Julia
Submitting author: @juliohm
Handling editor: @lheagy (Retired)
Reviewers: @wkearn, @ziotom78
Similarity score: 0.7375

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

danielskatz · 2024-06-26T18:28:04Z

👋 @jbytecode - I know you are at your editing limit, but this submission made me think of you 🙂 so I thought I would check and see if you wanted to take it; perhaps one of your current submissions are close to complete?

danielskatz · 2024-06-26T18:28:16Z

@editorialbot invite @jbytecode as editor

editorialbot · 2024-06-26T18:28:18Z

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

AkchurinDA · 2024-06-26T19:21:06Z

Hi,

I would like to suggest the following potential reviewers for the paper based on their respective research domains listed here:

baxmittens - uncertainty quantification
rafaelorozco - uncertainty quantification

I would also be happy to provide a list of potential reviewers outside of that list.

Thank you.

jbytecode · 2024-06-26T21:42:42Z

@editorialbot assign me as editor

@danielskatz sure!

editorialbot · 2024-06-26T21:42:45Z

Assigned! @jbytecode is now the editor

jbytecode · 2024-06-27T16:58:21Z

👋👋👋 Dear @baxmittens, @rafaelorozco 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:

[PRE REVIEW]: Fortuna.jl: Structural and System Reliability Analysis in Julia

You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (Provided above link).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be nearly 25 check items for each single reviewer.

Thank you in advance!

@rafaelorozco - I know you have one more workload at JOSS, but I think you can sequentially handle them. Please tell me otherwise.

AkchurinDA · 2024-06-28T16:21:16Z

Hi, @jbytecode,

Thanks for agreeing to be the editor!

I have a quick question: It is OK if I update the paper (fixed a few typos and improved the readability of a few sentences) before the reviewers get assigned?

jbytecode · 2024-06-28T16:23:40Z

@AkchurinDA - Sure. Apply your changes and trig an @editorialbox generate pdf command here. Could you please, if possible, provide some more potential reviewers in case we fail to get a response from the invited ones.

AkchurinDA · 2024-06-28T17:07:20Z

Thanks, @jbytecode!

Sure, here is a list of 3 potential external reviewers who work in the field of structural and system reliability analysis and with whom I don't have any conflicts of interest:

AkchurinDA · 2024-06-28T17:09:52Z

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot · 2024-06-28T17:11:06Z

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

jbytecode · 2024-06-28T17:11:41Z

@AkchurinDA - We need their GitHub handles to communicate with. Please provide GitHub usernames without using the @ character. You can use the search tool: https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/reviewers

editorialbot · 2024-06-28T17:11:51Z

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

OpenGeoSysUncertaintyQuantification.jl: a Julia library implementing an uncertainty quantification toolbox for OpenGeoSys
Submitting author: @baxmittens
Handling editor: @kanishkan91 (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @dannys4
Similarity score: 0.8069

GaussianRandomFields.jl: A Julia package to generate and sample from Gaussian random fields
Submitting author: @PieterjanRobbe
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @shahmoradi
Similarity score: 0.7720

GlobalSensitivity.jl: Performant and Parallel Global Sensitivity Analysis with Julia
Submitting author: @Vaibhavdixit02
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @zhenwu0728, @storyetfall
Similarity score: 0.7634

POMDPStressTesting.jl: Adaptive Stress Testing for Black-Box Systems
Submitting author: @mossr
Handling editor: @sbenthall (Active)
Reviewers: @jarvist, @sambitdash
Similarity score: 0.7483

UncertainData.jl: a Julia package for working with measurements and datasets with uncertainties.
Submitting author: @kahaaga
Handling editor: @oliviaguest (Active)
Reviewers: @dmbates, @ahwillia
Similarity score: 0.7290

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

AkchurinDA · 2024-06-28T17:25:58Z

@jbytecode

Oh, sorry, I think I misunderstood. These people are outside of the JOSS' list of reviewers and I don't know their GitHub handles.

I would propose the following potential reviewers from the list:

dannys4 - uncertainty quantification, numerical methods
ziyiyin97 - uncertainty quantification, numerical methods
dmbates - statistics
ahwillia - statistics

danielskatz · 2024-06-28T18:37:01Z

reviewers don't have to be from the list - that's just a source of possible reviewers...

jbytecode · 2024-06-28T18:45:20Z

@danielskatz - Thank you very much for the explanation. I had already mentioned that we only need GitHub account names. The list keeps the information of those who want to review for JOSS, but of course, we can invite other GitHub accounts from outside as well.

danielskatz · 2024-06-28T19:02:50Z

Editors can also search for GitHub accounts of potential reviewers, or contact them via email, where they may either say that they have a GitHub account already or are willing to create one to do the review.

jbytecode · 2024-06-28T19:05:50Z

@danielskatz - Sure! At least one of the suggested people has a GitHub account, and I will try to invite them if we don't get a response from the ones we've already invited.

jbytecode · 2024-06-30T17:04:38Z

Notes to everyone: I have sent an invitation email to Dr. Abbie B. Liel and Dr. Jared DeBock.

Dr. Brennan Bean had an easily accessible GitHub address, so I will send the invitation to them in the preview issue here.

jbytecode · 2024-06-30T17:07:36Z

Dear Dr. Brennan Bean (@beanb2)

I'm writing to you because you have been suggested as a potential reviewer for a paper in JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software).

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:

Fortuna.jl: Structural and System Reliability Analysis in Julia (#6931)

You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (Provided above link).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

If you accept reviewing, you can post a message in the GitHub link #6931

Thank you in advance!

beanb2 · 2024-06-30T20:58:23Z

Thank you for the offer. I would normally be very interested in this kind of opportunity and hope that JOSS will keep me in mind for future reviews. That said, I my wife is recovering from cancer treatment and I am unable to take on any additional responsibilities for the next 6 weeks. Assuming you want a timely review, I will need to pass on this offer. Brennan From: Mehmet Hakan Satman ***@***.***> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2024 11:08 AM To: openjournals/joss-reviews ***@***.***> Cc: Brennan Bean ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [openjournals/joss-reviews] [PRE REVIEW]: Fortuna.jl: Structural and System Reliability Analysis in Julia (Issue #6931) Dear Dr. Brennan Bean ***@***.***<https://github.com/beanb2>) I'm writing to you because you have been suggested as a potential reviewer for a paper in JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software). Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS? JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled: Fortuna.jl: Structural and System Reliability Analysis in Julia (#6931<#6931>) You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (Provided above link). The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know. If you accept reviewing, you can post a message in the GitHub link #6931<#6931> Thank you in advance! — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#6931 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AETAHGAFQEGWUPSEJSJLRI3ZKA3O5AVCNFSM6AAAAABJ6NQOK6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCOJYGYZDGNBZGA>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>

jbytecode · 2024-07-01T05:39:02Z

@beanb2 - I hope you quickly make positive progress in health matters, please let’s stay in touch. Thank you for the reply.

baxmittens · 2024-07-01T08:21:49Z

@jbytecode
Sorry for the late reply.
If you are still looking for a reviewer, I can do that.

jbytecode · 2024-07-01T08:59:56Z

@editorialbot add @baxmittens as reviewer

@baxmittens - Thank you for accepting our invitation, indeed it is not much late. I will inform you whenever we assign at least one more reviewer.

editorialbot · 2024-07-01T08:59:58Z

@baxmittens added to the reviewers list!

AkchurinDA · 2024-07-02T20:12:05Z

@beanb2 - Sorry to hear that, Dr. Bean. I hope your wife recovers as soon as possible. I will keep you in my thoughts.

jbytecode · 2024-07-03T15:25:02Z

👋👋👋 Dear @dannys4 👋👋👋

Would you be willing to assist in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)?

JOSS publishes articles about open source research software. The submission I'd like you to review is titled:

[PRE REVIEW]: Fortuna.jl: Structural and System Reliability Analysis in Julia

You can find more information at the top of this Github issue (Provided above link).

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. If you have any questions please let me know.

This is the pre-review issue. After setting at least 2 reviewers we will start the review process in a separate thread. In that thread, there will be nearly 25 check items for each single reviewer.

Thank you in advance!

rafaelorozco · 2024-07-05T17:53:55Z

Hello, sorry for the late reply! This looks like a very cool project and I would be happy to review if still needed.

jbytecode · 2024-07-05T18:16:36Z

@editorialbot add @rafaelorozco as reviewer

@rafaelorozco - Thank you for accepting our invitation. I will wait a little bit to get a response from other invitations before starting the review in a separate thread.

editorialbot · 2024-07-05T18:16:40Z

@rafaelorozco added to the reviewers list!

AkchurinDA · 2024-07-07T16:20:45Z

Hi @baxmittens and @rafaelorozco,
Thank you for agreeing to serve as reviewers of the paper!

AkchurinDA · 2024-07-07T16:21:03Z

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot · 2024-07-07T16:22:30Z

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

editorialbot · 2024-07-07T16:23:14Z

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

OpenGeoSysUncertaintyQuantification.jl: a Julia library implementing an uncertainty quantification toolbox for OpenGeoSys
Submitting author: @baxmittens
Handling editor: @kanishkan91 (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @dannys4
Similarity score: 0.8091

GaussianRandomFields.jl: A Julia package to generate and sample from Gaussian random fields
Submitting author: @PieterjanRobbe
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @shahmoradi
Similarity score: 0.7734

GlobalSensitivity.jl: Performant and Parallel Global Sensitivity Analysis with Julia
Submitting author: @Vaibhavdixit02
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @zhenwu0728, @storyetfall
Similarity score: 0.7648

POMDPStressTesting.jl: Adaptive Stress Testing for Black-Box Systems
Submitting author: @mossr
Handling editor: @sbenthall (Active)
Reviewers: @jarvist, @sambitdash
Similarity score: 0.7498

GeoStats.jl -- High-performance geostatistics in Julia
Submitting author: @juliohm
Handling editor: @lheagy (Retired)
Reviewers: @wkearn, @ziotom78
Similarity score: 0.7292

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

AkchurinDA · 2024-07-07T16:32:37Z

@editorialbot generate pdf

editorialbot · 2024-07-07T16:33:46Z

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

editorialbot · 2024-07-07T16:34:29Z

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

OpenGeoSysUncertaintyQuantification.jl: a Julia library implementing an uncertainty quantification toolbox for OpenGeoSys
Submitting author: @baxmittens
Handling editor: @kanishkan91 (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @dannys4
Similarity score: 0.8095

GaussianRandomFields.jl: A Julia package to generate and sample from Gaussian random fields
Submitting author: @PieterjanRobbe
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @shahmoradi
Similarity score: 0.7736

GlobalSensitivity.jl: Performant and Parallel Global Sensitivity Analysis with Julia
Submitting author: @Vaibhavdixit02
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @zhenwu0728, @storyetfall
Similarity score: 0.7649

POMDPStressTesting.jl: Adaptive Stress Testing for Black-Box Systems
Submitting author: @mossr
Handling editor: @sbenthall (Active)
Reviewers: @jarvist, @sambitdash
Similarity score: 0.7498

GeoStats.jl -- High-performance geostatistics in Julia
Submitting author: @juliohm
Handling editor: @lheagy (Retired)
Reviewers: @wkearn, @ziotom78
Similarity score: 0.7294

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

jbytecode · 2024-07-08T10:07:06Z

@editorialbot start review

editorialbot · 2024-07-08T10:07:10Z

OK, I've started the review over in #6967.

jbytecode · 2024-07-08T10:07:52Z

@AkchurinDA, @baxmittens and @rafaelorozco, the review start in page #6967

See you there.

editorialbot added pre-review Track: 7 (CSISM) Computer science, Information Science, and Mathematics labels Jun 26, 2024

editorialbot added Julia TeX labels Jun 26, 2024

editorialbot assigned jbytecode Jun 26, 2024

openjournals deleted a comment from editorialbot Jun 28, 2024

editorialbot assigned baxmittens Jul 1, 2024

editorialbot assigned rafaelorozco Jul 5, 2024

editorialbot closed this as completed Jul 8, 2024

[PRE REVIEW]: Fortuna.jl: Structural and System Reliability Analysis in Julia #6931

[PRE REVIEW]: Fortuna.jl: Structural and System Reliability Analysis in Julia #6931

Comments

editorialbot commented Jun 26, 2024 • edited Loading

Status

editorialbot commented Jun 26, 2024

editorialbot commented Jun 26, 2024

editorialbot commented Jun 26, 2024

editorialbot commented Jun 26, 2024

editorialbot commented Jun 26, 2024

editorialbot commented Jun 26, 2024

editorialbot commented Jun 26, 2024

danielskatz commented Jun 26, 2024

danielskatz commented Jun 26, 2024

editorialbot commented Jun 26, 2024

AkchurinDA commented Jun 26, 2024

jbytecode commented Jun 26, 2024

editorialbot commented Jun 26, 2024

jbytecode commented Jun 27, 2024

AkchurinDA commented Jun 28, 2024

jbytecode commented Jun 28, 2024

AkchurinDA commented Jun 28, 2024 • edited Loading

AkchurinDA commented Jun 28, 2024

editorialbot commented Jun 28, 2024

jbytecode commented Jun 28, 2024

editorialbot commented Jun 28, 2024

AkchurinDA commented Jun 28, 2024

danielskatz commented Jun 28, 2024

jbytecode commented Jun 28, 2024

danielskatz commented Jun 28, 2024

jbytecode commented Jun 28, 2024 • edited Loading

jbytecode commented Jun 30, 2024

jbytecode commented Jun 30, 2024

beanb2 commented Jun 30, 2024 via email

jbytecode commented Jul 1, 2024

baxmittens commented Jul 1, 2024 • edited Loading

jbytecode commented Jul 1, 2024

editorialbot commented Jul 1, 2024

AkchurinDA commented Jul 2, 2024

jbytecode commented Jul 3, 2024

rafaelorozco commented Jul 5, 2024

jbytecode commented Jul 5, 2024

editorialbot commented Jul 5, 2024

AkchurinDA commented Jul 7, 2024 • edited Loading

AkchurinDA commented Jul 7, 2024

editorialbot commented Jul 7, 2024

editorialbot commented Jul 7, 2024

AkchurinDA commented Jul 7, 2024

editorialbot commented Jul 7, 2024

editorialbot commented Jul 7, 2024

jbytecode commented Jul 8, 2024

editorialbot commented Jul 8, 2024

jbytecode commented Jul 8, 2024

editorialbot commented Jun 26, 2024 •

edited

Loading

AkchurinDA commented Jun 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading

jbytecode commented Jun 28, 2024 •

edited

Loading

baxmittens commented Jul 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

AkchurinDA commented Jul 7, 2024 •

edited

Loading