-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: Time-frequency component of the Green-X library: minimax grids for efficient RPA and GW calculations #5509
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Wordcount for |
Failed to discover a valid open source license |
|
Hello @aziziph, thanks for your submission to JOSS. We will use this pre-review issue to assign an editor and find reviewers. Any suggestions for the latter would be welcome! In the meantime, can you look at those missing DOI messages above for the paper? |
@editorialbot invite @lucydot as editor Hi @lucydot, this looks to be in your wheelhouse—can you edit this submission? |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
Hi @kyleniemeyer it is indeed! |
@editorialbot assign me as editor |
Assigned! @lucydot is now the editor |
Hi @aziziph, thank you for your submission to JOSS. I'll start looking for reviewers. If you could do the following it will help move things along:
|
Hi @lucydot We would like to thank you for reviewing the paper. The DOI has been fixed and will appear in pdf as soon as the pull request will be accepted. |
Dear @lucydot Is it possible to propose a person who is not listed in the list of reviewers? |
Thanks for suggesting me. Unfortunately I don't have bandwidth to take this on, and there might be a conflict of interest with @AlexBuccheri (although it's been more than 4 years...). |
Hello @aziziph yes, you can suggest someone not in the list of reviewers. Please do not include the |
@editorialbot generate pdf |
@editorialbot check references |
|
@aziziph I can see that the JOSS editorial bot and github have not automatically detected the license file. I suggest renaming this to the more standard |
@aziziph please also take a look at the three invalid DOI's listed above; you can check yourself if they compile correctly using |
Dear @lucydot |
I can review this, but I have a conflict of interest because I am a deputy leader on another WP for the NOMAD CoE. |
I could also review this, but I could also be biased as I am also part of the NOMAD CoE, I would suggest Merzuk as a better candidate. (https://www.nomad-coe.eu/nomad-coe/about-coe/team-nomad-coe) |
Hello, |
Ah ok thanks @tpurcell90 and @alejandrogallo, we will avoid any CoIs. |
Hello @mailhexu are you available to review this submission to JOSS? |
Yes, I can review this. |
The other potential reviewers in case it is needed: |
Excellent @mailhexu, thank-you! @daniele-varsano are you available to review this submission to JOSS? |
@editorialbot add @mailhexu as reviewer |
@mailhexu added to the reviewers list! |
Many thanks for suggesting me as a reviewer, but unfortunately I have to decline for lack of time due to some deadlines approaching. I can anyway suggest the following reviewer: andrea-ferretti |
@andrea-ferretti @DarioALeonValido - hello 👋 - are you available to review this submission to JOSS? |
@lucydot: Dear Lucy, thanks for writing. Unfortunately I am not able to accept the review at present (overwhelmed by other commitments). Best regards. |
@lucydot: Dear Lucy, thanks for the invitation, I am available to do the review. |
Excellent, thanks @DarioALeonValido 🎈 |
@editorialbot add @DarioALeonValido as reviewer |
@DarioALeonValido added to the reviewers list! |
OK, thanks for agreeing to review @mailhexu and @DarioALeonValido ⭐ ping @aziziph I'll ask @editorialbot to start the review proper (which will be on a separate thread). There will be more instructions there - the first reviewer task will be to generate a review checklist to work through. The process is different from traditional journals - it is an on-going conversation between reviewers, authors, editors and our bot. So I recommend starting the review early and keeping us updated as things progress rather than trying to complete the review or response to a review in a single-shot. If you have any questions, you can raise them on the review thread. |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #5570. |
@editorialbot generate pdf |
@editorialbot check references |
|
Submitting author: @aziziph (Maryam Azizi)
Repository: https://github.com/nomad-coe/greenX
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: V1.0.0
Editor: @lucydot
Reviewers: @mailhexu, @DarioALeonValido
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @aziziph. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@aziziph if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: