[PRE REVIEW]: WhaleMap: a tool to collate and display whale survey results in near real-time

[whedon]

Submitting author: @hansenjohnson (Hansen Johnson)
Repository: https://github.com/hansenjohnson/WhaleMap
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @KristinaRiemer
Reviewers: @pjbouchet, @mcsiple
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @hansenjohnson. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@hansenjohnson if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Failed to discover a Statement of need section in paper

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.29 s (401.5 files/s, 49296.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R                               99           3379           3328           5961
make                             1             97            105            446
Bourne Shell                    12             84             93            240
Markdown                         3             76              0            229
Rmd                              1             71             89            144
TeX                              1              1              0             22
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           117           3708           3615           7042
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '6ef6b0d3ad106134a17acf8a' was
gathered on 2021/02/20.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1121/10.0001811 is OK
- 10.1111/csp2.267 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@hansenjohnson thanks for this submission. Our system detected the paper currently lacks a Statement of need section which is required. Can you add such a section to you paper? It should illustrate the research purpose of the software.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

Notes for handling editor, this work seems to relate to these papers:
#1825
#2097
#2172

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@KristinaRiemer @karthik @marcosvital @jni could one of you handle this submission? Note there are some related papers ☝️ which might help to find reviewers too.

[hansenjohnson]

Thank you @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman! I made some very slight changes to explicitly include a Statement of need section. Sorry for omitting that in the first place!

[hansenjohnson]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository

[hansenjohnson]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@KristinaRiemer @karthik @marcosvital @jni @kthyng could one of you handle this submission? Note these are some related papers which might help to find reviewers too:
#1825
#2097
#2172

[kthyng]

Hi @hansenjohnson and thanks for your submission. It looks like a really interesting project! I am going to ping the editorial board to make sure that it is in scope before we move forward. This isn't a statement on how awesome your project is, but just to check for fit. This will take 1-2 weeks and someone will get back to you. Thanks for your patience.

[kthyng]

@whedon query scope

[whedon]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[hansenjohnson]

Thank you @kthyng! I recognize this is a bit of an odd submission and think a scope query is a great place to start. I look forward to hearing from the team. Much appreciated!

[danielskatz]

This submission has been determined to be in-scope

[danielskatz]

👋 @KristinaRiemer - you were suggested as the editor for this submission. Are you able to take it on?

[danielskatz]

@whedon invite @KristinaRiemer as editor

[whedon]

@KristinaRiemer has been invited to edit this submission.

[KristinaRiemer]

Hi, yes, I'm able to take care of this submission. (I had accidentally turned off GitHub notifications for this repo 🤦‍♀️)

[KristinaRiemer]

@whedon assign me as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @KristinaRiemer

[KristinaRiemer]

@whedon assign @pjbouchet as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @pjbouchet is now a reviewer

[KristinaRiemer]

@whedon add @mcsiple as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @mcsiple is now a reviewer

[KristinaRiemer]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3094.

[KristinaRiemer]

Thanks to @pjbouchet and @mcsiple for agreeing to review this submission! The review will happen in the GitHub issue linked to above. Feel free to ask me questions there! Use the checklist as a guide for your review, and file issues in the submission repo to suggest improvements.