Does this repository match the published version?

[PeterParslow]

The repository's readme says

"This version is based upon Edition 3 Draft, in which Review/comments were invited by 31 October 2021. "

The published version (https://standards.unggim.ogc.org/index.php) is Edition 3.0.0:2022-01-01.

If we publish again from this repository, will we lose whatever changed between the October 2021 draft and the January 2022 publication?

I've tried looking at some bits, and not all look the same. For example, the Appendix titles at https://standards.unggim.ogc.org/index.php are different to those in the adoc files in https://github.com/opengeospatial/unggim_standards_guide/tree/main/Appendices - but I'm not sure those files are used in the published online guide, where the appendices are linked spreadsheets rather than HTML files.

[ogcscotts]

request for republication has been made

[PeterParslow]

request for republication has been made

https://standards.unggim.ogc.org/unggim_guide.html still has "ISO 19169" for API Features...

[ogcscotts]

published: https://standards.unggim.ogc.org/index.php

[PeterParslow]

Looks good. Which can't be said of the PDF version which is linked & contains the corrections, but also contains a lot of unprocessed HTML tags in places. That should perhaps be a new issue "some HTML tags not handled in PDF publishing"?

[PeterParslow]

@ogcscotts : is there anything we (you, Greg?) can do about the html tags in the PDF?

[ogcscotts]

@gbuehler does Asciidoctor-pdf have a problem with HTML tags that include the window="_blank" modifier?

[gbuehler]

Per https://docs.asciidoctor.org/asciidoc/latest/macros/link-macro-attribute-parsing/

the Asciidoc should be window=_blank without the quotes.

[gbuehler]

Note that this fix did not exactly work.

So what I did was for the PDF version only I did a search and replace for , window=_blank with '' then I ran the command:

asciidoctor-pdf -o unggim_guide.pdf unggim.adoc

and posted that document. The repo still contains all the , window=_blank as that is needed for the HTML.

[PeterParslow]

Thanks, Greg, for sorting that out - The PDF likes good now.

Those instructions should be stored somewhere for future use, e.g. after the IHO meeting in March that should consider / decide on #6. I've summarised in the Readme