Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove reference to some SSN terms #76

Open
alexrobin opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Remove reference to some SSN terms #76

alexrobin opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
ready Was discussed during a telecon and a decision was made

Comments

@alexrobin
Copy link
Collaborator

The SystemKind class and its subclasses were dropped from the latest SOSA/SSN draft so we need to revert to use the plain System classes identifiers for procedure types.

This is OK for us because the mere fact that they are in the procedures or systems collections indicate whether they are System instances or System kinds. We need to explain this.

@alexrobin alexrobin added the ready Was discussed during a telecon and a decision was made label Oct 17, 2024
@alexrobin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Discussed during 10/17 telecon.

Will revert to using SOSA URIs for System and subclasses in Table 16: Procedure Types

@autermann autermann self-assigned this Dec 10, 2024
@autermann
Copy link
Member

There are even more changes, the http://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/ActuatingProcedure mentioned in Table 16 doesn't exist, it was called https://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/om#ActuationProcedure and now it seems to be gone: https://w3c.github.io/sdw-sosa-ssn/ssn/#OMS-New-Terms
Instead there is now a new http://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/oms/PreparationProcedure...

@alexrobin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Discussed during 12/12 telecon.

We will use the following to the enum:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready Was discussed during a telecon and a decision was made
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants