@dstenger

I went through test implementation but unable to find references for Schematron.
I think Schematron is not used in this test.

Can you please check if it is possible to include schematrons in this test suite (beware, it is CTL)?

@dstenger

We can do this implementation as similar to the ets-csw20. Here is the reference:

https://github.com/opengeospatial/ets-csw202/blob/55137829e03856a11fbe95399adebb0c17d7b5bc/src/main/scripts/ctl/GetCapabilities/CSW-GetCapabilities-GET.xml#L116-L120

The provided Schematron can be used to test the WMTS Simple Profile but not the implementation standard itself (see https://www.ogc.org/standards/wmts).

@ghobona We should check if a test of the simple profile can be integrated into the test suite.

@dstenger

We should integrate the WMTS Simple Profile into the existing WMTS ETS.

I will ask @keshav-nangare to proceed with the integration.

Discussion on 2020-07-22, @keshav-nangare to add the schematron in a separate test in the WMTS test suite.

@dstenger @ghobona

Following are my findings:

• I faced some issues while loading Schematron referred in the first comment:
  1. The namespace for Schematron currently refers to http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron.
  2. It does not define any phase which can execute the pattern and the element value-of is having a problem as below:
     Line 30 - element "sch:value-of" not allowed here; expected the element end-tag, text, element "sch:dir", "sch:emph", "sch:name" or "sch:span" or an element from another namespace

• I have updated the Schematron as per below which loads successfully.
  1. The namespace should be changed to http://www.ascc.net/xml/schematron.
  2. Added the DefaultPhase and removed the value-of element statement.

Let me know your thought on this.

@dstenger @ghobona

I have investigated the Schematron issue with ISO namespace and found a problem with our SchematronParser library. Currently, TE SchematronValidatingParser.java using jing library to validate Schematron as per investigation it is not supporting the latest ISO Schematron. Also, I found a similar issue(# 258) opened in their GitHub repository.

Should we use different libraries to validate ISO Schematron? What is your opinion on this?

I would suggest creating a separate class called ISOSchematronValidatingParser.java, then using ph-schematron with the new class.

@keshav-nangare Please create a new issue in TEAM Engine tracker and implement an ISOSchematronValidatingParser as suggested in comment #27 (comment).

ph-schematron uses Saxon-HE. Thus, opengeospatial/teamengine#32 must be solved first.

Alternatively, we can check if there is another schematron library.

The changes for the Schematron are included in the #69 PR.

This issue has been overtaken by events.