You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
mentioned in paper,"given the same batch size, GEAR significantly reduces the peak memory compared to FP16 baseline, increasing the maximum severing number (i.e., batch size) from 3 to 18"
Why does the peak memory of GEAR decrease at a slope that is 1/4 to 1/3 of FP16 as the batch size increases? Is it due to the quantization of activations?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mentioned in paper,"given the same batch size, GEAR significantly reduces the peak memory compared to FP16 baseline, increasing the maximum severing number (i.e., batch size) from 3 to 18"
Why does the peak memory of GEAR decrease at a slope that is 1/4 to 1/3 of FP16 as the batch size increases? Is it due to the quantization of activations?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: