-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AmberTools19 compute_partial_charges_am1bcc fails on acetate #532
Comments
While there's no
|
Hm, I'm realizing that, with the addition of WBO calculations in AmberToolsToolkitWrapper (#508), as well as the antechamber API changes in this issue, we might not WANT to provide support for AmberMini (which is based on AmberTools16) in our next release. Trying to support both would involve
Forcing all users to upgrade to AT19 would be a bit painful up front, but on the other hand, it would help with things like #130 (which can only be solved with an AT upgrade). Thoughts? |
+1 on dropping support for AmberTools < 19 - it seems the maintenance overhead added by trying to support both would not be worth the effort, and migrating to 19 would provide significant benefits. If this causes significant issues for users, they could always implement their own subclass of |
Yes, agree relating to force an upgrade. We should require the more recent version. |
Maybe a deprecation warning in an intermediate release? |
This reminds me that I should also add a I can do this now or as part of the AT 20 release. |
Oh, it's awesome that you can make them mutually exclusive. OFFTK 0.7.0 will miss its next-monday deadline, so accounting for conference travel, it will likely be out mid-March. So, if you could have the latest |
I'd be OK with an informative error, but I'm not sure about a deprecation warning, since then we still have to do all of the work of supporting both versions simultaneously. Don't get me wrong -- We do add deprecation warnings -- we're even adding some for |
I jumped the gun on this and switched the We might only use |
No worries! We didn't have a test that triggered this behavior until now, so I'm also to blame (heck, it's on me that we were missing the test in the first place, and ALSO I approved the PR for the switch). |
Describe the bug
Output
Antechamber complains about the central carbon only having three bonds
Solution
Turn acdoctor off using
-dr n
command line arguments.Similar issue is listed here: http://archive.ambermd.org/201705/0020.html
One complication is that this may not work with AmberMini, since acdoctor wasn't bundled into antechamber until recently.
Computing environment (please complete the following information):
MacOS X
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: